Often neglected as an influence on phenomenology, Bergson's thought has resurfaced and brought challenges to phenomenology. In a series of original essays and translations, leading scholars of contemporary continental philosophy seek to redress this oversight and inaugurate a long over due dialogue and yet pertinent to the future of continental philosophy. This thematically foc...(展开全部)

Kolakowski shows how Henri Bergson sought to reconcile Darwin's theory with his own beliefs about the nature of the universe. Bergson believed that time could be thought of in two different ways: as an abstract measuring device used for practical purposes, or as duree, the "real" time we actually experience. He also held that all matter is propelled by an internal elan vital, o...(展开全部)

莱斯泽克•柯拉柯夫斯基（Leszek Kolakowski，1927—，又译作“科拉科夫斯基”，以下简称柯氏）是当今西方世界著名哲学家之一。柯氏的代表作无疑是《马克思主义的主流》一书。全书三卷于1978年由牛津大学出版社出版，洋洋130万言。该书阐述了自19世纪40 年代至20世纪70年代间马克思主义诸代表人物、主要流派及学说的理论发展，是迄今为止西方学术界论述马克思主义史的体系最庞大、内容最丰富的一部著作，奠定了作者在当今西方“马克思学”领域中的重要地位，产生了较为广泛的影响。

莱斯泽克•柯拉柯夫斯基（Leszek Kolakowski，1927—，又译作“科拉科夫斯基”，以下简称柯氏）是当今西方世界著名哲学家之一。柯氏的代表作无疑是《马克思主义的主流》一书。全书三卷于1978年由牛津大学出版社出版，洋洋130万言。该书阐述了自19世纪40 年代至20世纪70年代间马克思主义诸代表人物、主要流派及学说的理论发展，是迄今为止西方学术界论述马克思主义史的体系最庞大、内容最丰富的一部著作，奠定了作者在当今西方“马克思学”领域中的重要地位，产生了较为广泛的影响。

莱斯泽克•柯拉柯夫斯基（Leszek Kolakowski，1927—，又译作“科拉科夫斯基”，以下简称柯氏）是当今西方世界著名哲学家之一。柯氏的代表作无疑是《马克思主义的主流》一书。全书三卷于1978年由牛津大学出版社出版，洋洋130万言。该书阐述了自19世纪40 年代至20世纪70年代间马克思主义诸代表人物、主要流派及学说的理论发展，是迄今为止西方学术界论述马克思主义史的体系最庞大、内容最丰富的一部著作，奠定了作者在当今西方“马克思学”领域中的重要地位，产生了较为广泛的影响。

莱斯泽克•柯拉柯夫斯基（Leszek Kolakowski，1927—，又译作“科拉科夫斯基”，以下简称柯氏）是当今西方世界著名哲学家之一。柯氏的代表作无疑是《马克思主义的主流》一书。全书三卷于1978年由牛津大学出版社出版，洋洋130万言。该书阐述了自19世纪40 年代至20世纪70年代间马克思主义诸代表人物、主要流派及学说的理论发展，是迄今为止西方学术界论述马克思主义史的体系最庞大、内容最丰富的一部著作，奠定了作者在当今西方“马克思学”领域中的重要地位，产生了较为广泛的影响。

Kolakowski shows how Henri Bergson sought to reconcile Darwin's theory with his own beliefs about the nature of the universe. Bergson believed that time could be thought of in two different ways: as an abstract measuring device used for practical purposes, or as duree, the "real" time we actually experience. He also held that all matter is propelled by an internal elan vital, o...(展开全部)

According to the line of thought that inspires this book, we as readers and philosophers are not compelled to choose between Hegel and Husserl. Our task is rather that of unearthing the philosophical relevance of those problems that both Hegel and Husserl taught us to rethink in a radical way. Starting with a historical appraisal of the Hegelian heritage in the phenomenological...(展开全部)

Phenomenology, together with Marxism, pragmatism, and analytic philosophy, dominated philosophy in the twentieth century - and Edmund Husserl is usually thought to have been the first to develop the concept. His views influenced a variety of important later thinkers, such as Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty, who eventually turned phenomenology away from questions of knowledge. But i...(展开全部)

According to the line of thought that inspires this book, we as readers and philosophers are not compelled to choose between Hegel and Husserl. Our task is rather that of unearthing the philosophical relevance of those problems that both Hegel and Husserl taught us to rethink in a radical way. Starting with a historical appraisal of the Hegelian heritage in the phenomenological...(展开全部)